European Union Essay

During the 20th century, many distinguishable views arose concerning the matrimony of a previously divided Europe. Opinions varied dep endinging on the individuals country and heritage, but largely because unification could mitigate conditions in some countries, while jeopardizing the conditions in new(prenominal)s. Those in favor of a unified Europe ordinarily had something to gain from it, while those who were against it had something to lose. Many countries were tired subsequently WW1 and WW2, and interested in finding a doable source of peace.As Konrad Adenaver states Nations cannot continue to live solely according to their own desires and inclinations. (Doc 6). The ideas of new imperialism and nationalism were beingness replaced with ideas of peace and unification. In this hope for new lay down peace , countries such as France, Germany, and many other countries became involved in the European Economic Comm oneness( europium). Sir Winston Churchill wished to be more lik e the U. S, and to form a council of Europe. (Doc1) being the former Prime minister Britain, he force want this due to Britain ties and respect for the U. S.Not everyone shared out this respect for the U. S, as shown in a Soviet Newspaper, a cartoon of a greedy American destroying Sovereignty of West European Countries. (Doc 4) Spain stick outmed to also withstand some hesitation in the idea of a unified Europe. The prime minister of Spain, Felipe Gonzalez, states NATO membership and connectedness the European Community mean the end of the handed-down isolation of span. (Doc 11) Since the U. S was the creator of NATO, Spain might gravel some distaste towards America for being go away out of NATO, while Russians may have hostility left over from the cold war.France seemed to be a bit irritated with the fact that Britain first refused to embark and even took a hostile attitude, as if the EEC were a economic and political threat. (Doc 8) These words, spoken by the President of France Charles de Gaulle, summed up the attitude of many French. He also claimed Britain had too many ties to America to be fully committed to a Europe coalescence. Harold Macmillan, the British finance minister claimed that joining the EEC would hold our system of favoring rade with the British common wealth. (Doc 7) Britain did want unity but it also needed to do what would be best for the country individually, as summed up in the words of Margaret Thatcher, British Prime look, We want to see Europe more united and with a great sense of common purpose, but it must be in a way which preserves the diametric traditions, etc. (Doc12) Britain was still a big compelling country, and did not necessarily benefit from the unity as much as smaller countries would.Italy Prime Minister Jack Lynch declares his commitment to EEC, saying We would of course be interested in the defense of the territories marry by that community(Doc 10) Although there were many different reasons why co untries would want a united Europe, it did end up happening. Although there was still some perplexity as Duncan Sandys stated (speaking of Charles de Gaulle) Were gravely suspicious of the form _or_ system of government of American and British governments,(Doc 2) a European Union was formed. The United States did, and still does, have a sozzled influence over Europe, but Europes unification makes it more powerful force as well.